Our previous video established that people care. Now we go
to the core, the deliberate manipulation of science.
The government and Greens policies are based on reports by
the United Nations Inter-governmental Panel on Climate
Change, the UN IPCC. It selects scientists and activists to
read literature. UN politicians then write Summary Reports
given to national governments and media.
The IPCC does no scientific research. It?s not accountable to
any national governments. It is accountable to no one.
Our web site provides a brief global climate alarm timeline
starting with 1974?s supposed, forecast, imminent,
irreversible catastrophic global … freezing. A new Ice Age.
Blamed on? Coal and oil.
More at: www.conscious.com.au
Some of the same climate scientists who now fabricate
global warming brought you global cooling just 30 years
ago. The same supposed cause producing a completely
Two years later, in 1976 a slight increase in temperatures
was christened the Great Pacific Climate Shift
Just four years later, at the UN?s 1980 conference in
Villach, Austria, government scientists from around the
world refused to sign the UN?s claim of global warming due
to human production of carbon dioxide. They said “there?s
The UN learned its lesson. For its next conference in 1985,
the UN selected the delegates. Those delegates signed The
UN?s claim despite the continuing lack of evidence. The UN
fabricated global warming.
In 1995, five times IPCC scientists reported there?s no
evidence of human warming. Yet UN politicians reported to
national governments and media, and I quote: “The balance
of evidence suggests a discernible human influence on
global climate”. The UN, contradicting the evidence. Why?
I?ll tell you why. The IPCC?s actual written instructions
state that once they?ve announced the politics, in this case
the supposed need to reduce human production of carbon
dioxide, then the only changes they will publish to the
science report, to use their exact words, “shall be those
necessary to ensure consistency with the Summary for
Policymakers (SPM)”. That is, the political document.
Tim Ball in chapter 11 of the book „Slaying the Sky
The IPCC?s Chairman at the time, Bert Bolin, had
previously pushed for a carbon dioxide tax before the IPCC
was even formed. The politics, the grab for money and
power was decided before they even started the science.
As PM, Kevin Rudd echoed IPCC Chairman Rajendra
Pachauri repeatedly saying 4,000 scientists claim warming
is blamed on human production of carbon dioxide. UN
figures though reveal only 5 reviewers endorsed that claim.
Not 4,000 scientists, just 5 reviewers. A blatant falsity from
the very top of the UN?s climate body, spread by the very
top of the Rudd-Gillard-Brown government.
Chapter 9 of the IPCC?s latest report, 2007, is its core. This
section is where it actually claims there is warming and
attributes it to human production of carbon dioxide. I?ve
read it, completely, twice. There is no evidence that human
production of CO2 caused warming.
UN Expert Science Reviewer, internationally eminent
research scientist Dr Vincent Gray has around 60 years realworld
experience in science, including the last 21 years in
climate. He?s reviewed all four IPCC reports: 1990, „95,
2001, 2007. He says there?s no evidence of man made
Then go to Vincent Gray, Review of Chapter 9
IPCC data reveals that the peer review processes are
corrupted, often bypassed, sometimes prevented. Its latest
report, 2007, cites and relies on more than five and a half
thousand references that were not peer reviewed, including
hikers? stories, newspaper articles and political activists?
campaign material. Yet IPCC Chairman Rajendra Pachauri
repeatedly claims 100% use of peer-reviewed science. Yet
another blatant falsity from the very top of the UN climate
body, spread by the top of the Rudd-Gillard-Brown govt.
In Australia, I?ve asked for evidence from all 8 publicly
prominent university academics spreading global warming
fear: Flannery, Karoly, Garnaut, Steffen, England, Pitman,
Lambeck, Hoegh-Guldberg. And from CSIRO?s Chief
Executive Megan Clark and its Group Environmental
executive, Andrew Johnson. And Australia?s Chief Scientist
appointed under Rudd, Penny Sackett. And recently from
the Australian Academy of Science’s Science Policy
Manager, Martin Callinan. Who, reportedly, previously
worked for Rudd’s government.
Refer to posted copies of correspondence under the
sub-heading: ‘Do these academics sound like climate
Flannery is the government?s Chief Climate Commissioner.
Steffen a Commissioner. Karoly, England and Pitman are on
the Climate Commission?s Science Advisory Panel. Garnaut
seems the government?s main climate adviser.
Most replied. They all failed to provide evidence. They fail
to disclose their financial interests. All are government
funded. Your taxes. No evidence.
Fraud is defined by the dictionary as the presentation of
something as it is not for personal gain.
The international Inter-Academy Council reviewed the
IPCC disgraced by the Climategate scandal. So critical is
the Council?s report, it?s impossible for anyone to know
which IPCC statements, if any, can be believed. There can
be no confidence at all in the IPCC?s latest report, 2007.
Yet the Council?s Executive Summary was inconsistent in
tone and content with the report?s body. The Executive
Summary appears to violate the Council?s own guidelines.
One of the two summary authors is Kurt Lambeck, former
President of the Australian Academy of Science. He?s in the
Australian National University?s Climate Change Institute.
Its Director is Will Steffen.
Close interconnections between climate research institutes
within major universities, the IPCC, various academies and
government bodies are deep and extensive. The common
thread? Government funding.
It ranges from research grants to publication under another
name of glossy documents funded by the Department of
Climate Change. Yet none have any specific real-world
scientific evidence that human production of carbon dioxide
caused Earth?s latest modest atmospheric warming period
that ended around 1998. Some documents appear to simply
Is the academics? position accidental, an honest mistake,
unconscious, deliberately deceptive or fraudulent? You
0Fraud_part%201.pdf (see 2010, Climategate)
It?s clear. There?s no consensus attributing global warming
to carbon dioxide. There?s no scientific evidence for the
government?s claim. The basis for government climate
policy is political reports driven by a political agenda
reversing and corrupting science. Misrepresentations of
science are promoted by people benefitting financially from
spreading climate fear.
None of this will help our planet. It hurts our planet. It hurts
Check for yourself at our web site. Section 1 is entitled
“Scientific Untruths”. We expose UN and government
misrepresentations of science. We have provided a short
summary and a full argument with references.
In our next episode we will look at the core facts on carbon
dioxide. Facts agreed on by both climate alarmists and
These facts reveal that carbon dioxide cannot do what
climate alarmists claim.